Friday, April 14, 2006

Bad Reception

I am working from home today and I would like to use my blog as a platform to complain about the terrible cell phone coverage in my apartment. I just noticed, after going to the kitchen to get a glass of water, that my connection is so tenuous that mearly walking in front of the phone can cause it to drop coverage completely.

It's the 21st century. I live in densely populated New Jersey. I should have better coverage than this. It's a travesty! Can someone please think of the children!

Thursday, April 13, 2006

Where to Stick Your Money

I was looking at my Fidelity account today and I discovered something most interesting.

I was looking into moving some money out of Fidelity's equivalent of a savings account and into my cash account so I could, theoretically, buy a mutual fund I have been looking at.

I noticed, in the side-bar, that the fund was giving something of a rediculous number as it's Compound Yield. Interest and such numbers confuse me, so I went and looked at the actual amount of money deposited as interest last month. As a percentage of the total amount, it was more than three times more than Chase's EXTREME SUPER PLUS SAVINGS ACCOUNT.

So I am like, wow! If only they did Bill Pay. And lo: they do bill pay!
So I am like, wow wow! If only you could do direct deposit. And lo: you can do direct deposit!
If only they offered and ATM card. And lo: they offer an ATM card! Holy crap!

Who knew Fidelity does all the stuff that a regular bank does. What the hell am I doing my banking with Chase for?! Argh, I bet that's why the woman who opened my account at Chase was looking at me funny the whole time. She was probably thinking, "If you have a Fidelity account, what do you need with a Chase account?"

Anyways, so this advertisement for Fidelity was brought to you by my own reluctance to do actual work.

Saturday, April 08, 2006

The Making of the Atomic Bomb

I finally finished this book. Thanks Laurie!

It wont the Pulitzer Prize and deservedly so in my opinion. Very smart, very thorough. It covers the birth of nuclear weapons from E=MC2 to the devlopment of the first thermo-nuclear weapon.

It's a fascinating tale of the emergence of science as a weapon in nationalist wars. And, if you buy the book's thesis, the eventual dominance of science over nationalism. Humans designed a bomb so big that it made world war impossible (though whether it worked still remains to be seen).

Fortunately, the author (Richard Rhodes), spends very little time waxing philosophic. Most of the book's 800 pages are dedicated to following the long, winding and often arduous treck from the idea that mass and energy are the same to the creation of a physical weapon utilizing that idea. The physics isn't intimidating and the story is mesmerizing.

A+

(put that on your book cover!)

ps. I forgot to mention the book does a good job sorting out explanations/motivations for the individuals involved (from Leo Szilard to Oppenheimer to General Groves to Harry Truman) and why they chose to develop, prioritize, build, weaponize and use the atomic bomb.

Apparently, there was a lot of confusion over whether the Germans might have been working on a bomb of their own. And certainly they were, but the eventual dominance of allied air power over Europe, and the ensuing bombing, shut down any hope of large-scale production. So though the Nazis were experimenting with nuclear power, they weren't very close to making a weapon when the war ended.

The book also discusses, but does not pass judgement, on the prevaling opinion amoung allied forces that an invasion of mainland Japan would cost millions of allied lives and an even greater number of civilian Japanese. Whether or not that justifies dropping WMD on two major population centers is up in the air. But it seems that the real motivation (for both the military and scientist types) was to show the world what sort of devastation this bomb could cause.