You may have heard: the head of the CIA, Porter Goss, is stepping down after a notably brief career. A related story hasn't been getting as much ink, but plenty of bytes & pixels are being filled in the blogosphere.
It's
Hookergate. Oh... wait... no. I mean, "
Hookergate".
Clearly it's a scandal, because the bloggers have chosen to add the suffix "gate" to the dirty word "hooker".
First of all, Watergate is the name of a hotel that was
burglarized by Nixon's cronies searching for dirt on the happless DNC. You can read about it in the wikipedia (thank god for the wikipedia) if you need to, but clearly the scandal that drove Nixon out of the White House did not involve him using excessive amounts of water.
If only the hotel had been the Hilton/Best Western. Then we wouldn't be saddled with this meaningless suffix.
My second gripe about the name is that it puts the emphasis for the scandal on the hookers that were supposedly sometimes used in the influence peddling. As though influence peddling not involving prostitution would be fine.
Can't we have moral outrage stemming from the fact that Bush appoints lackies to
key positions in government. And then those unqualified hacks,
demoralize and deflate the angencies they're supposed to be leading. Which leads us to a
disaster.
Isn't it enough that Porter Goss may have done
to the CIA what Michael Brown did to FEMA?
But his swift and surprising resignation wasn't due to the fact that he was incompetent. It was because Bush & company couldn't keep this story under wraps any longer. (The scandalous behavior has apparently been going on for a decade or more)
So how about a new scandal? You can call it
Competencegate.